<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for bryanerogers's weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:34:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Al Groh Drinking Game by Al Groh Drinking Game, Revisited &#171; bryanerogers&#8217;s weblog</title>
		<link>http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com/2008/11/07/the-al-groh-drinking-game/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Groh Drinking Game, Revisited &#171; bryanerogers&#8217;s weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com/?p=215#comment-131</guid>
		<description>[...] quick recap of the Al Groh Drinking Game [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] quick recap of the Al Groh Drinking Game [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Landesberg beyond 2009 by mde2n</title>
		<link>http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/landesberg-beyond-2009/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>mde2n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/landesberg-beyond-2009/#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Nice reference to Rule of the Bone.  I thought the Iman reference would be to David Bowie&#039;s wife.  You had the better reference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice reference to Rule of the Bone.  I thought the Iman reference would be to David Bowie&#8217;s wife.  You had the better reference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Petergate cont&#8217;d by Vic Hall at QB Revisited &#171; bryanerogers&#8217;s weblog</title>
		<link>http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com/2008/09/25/petergate-contd/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Hall at QB Revisited &#171; bryanerogers&#8217;s weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com/?p=103#comment-116</guid>
		<description>[...] practiced under center in “some basic offensive sets” in preparation for the UConn game, after Peter Lalich’s dismal left no clear third option behind starter Marc Verica and 5th-year senior Deke.  Groh commented [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] practiced under center in “some basic offensive sets” in preparation for the UConn game, after Peter Lalich’s dismal left no clear third option behind starter Marc Verica and 5th-year senior Deke.  Groh commented [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stats are for Losers Redux by Just Win the Close Ones? &#171; bryanerogers&#8217;s weblog</title>
		<link>http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/stats-are-for-losers-redux/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Win the Close Ones? &#171; bryanerogers&#8217;s weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com/?p=258#comment-115</guid>
		<description>[...] we told you after Week 9 and after Week 11, a glimpse into points per 100 yards of total offense reveals the dichotomy of Jim Zorn’s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we told you after Week 9 and after Week 11, a glimpse into points per 100 yards of total offense reveals the dichotomy of Jim Zorn’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stats Are For Losers (and 6-3 Underachievers) by Just Win the Close Ones? &#171; bryanerogers&#8217;s weblog</title>
		<link>http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com/2008/11/04/stats-are-for-losers-and-6-3-underachievers/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Win the Close Ones? &#171; bryanerogers&#8217;s weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com/?p=209#comment-114</guid>
		<description>[...] we told you after Week 9 and after Week 11, a glimpse into points per 100 yards of total offense reveals the dichotomy of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we told you after Week 9 and after Week 11, a glimpse into points per 100 yards of total offense reveals the dichotomy of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Diamond Cutter? by Clemson: What To Expect &#171; bryanerogers&#8217;s weblog</title>
		<link>http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/diamond-cutter/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Clemson: What To Expect &#171; bryanerogers&#8217;s weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com/?p=247#comment-113</guid>
		<description>[...] online that his “gut feeling” is VPI DC Bud Foster (resemblance to Steve Spagnuolo chronicled here) is “soon to be” the next head man in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] online that his “gut feeling” is VPI DC Bud Foster (resemblance to Steve Spagnuolo chronicled here) is “soon to be” the next head man in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Renardo Sidney Cont&#8217;d by McDonald&#8217;s vs. Burger King &#171; bryanerogers&#8217;s weblog</title>
		<link>http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com/2008/11/15/renardo-sidney-contd/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>McDonald&#8217;s vs. Burger King &#171; bryanerogers&#8217;s weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com/?p=233#comment-112</guid>
		<description>[...]  More on the budding (?) Renardo Sidney–Dave Leitao relationship, originally documented here and here…  Tuesday’s LA Times recap of The Sidney family’s visit to Charlottesville last weekend [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  More on the budding (?) Renardo Sidney–Dave Leitao relationship, originally documented here and here…  Tuesday’s LA Times recap of The Sidney family’s visit to Charlottesville last weekend [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Get-able Get? by McDonald&#8217;s vs. Burger King &#171; bryanerogers&#8217;s weblog</title>
		<link>http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com/2008/11/13/a-get-able-get/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>McDonald&#8217;s vs. Burger King &#171; bryanerogers&#8217;s weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com/?p=229#comment-111</guid>
		<description>[...]  More on the budding (?) Renardo Sidney–Dave Leitao relationship, originally documented here and here…  Tuesday’s LA Times recap of The Sidney family’s visit to Charlottesville last [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  More on the budding (?) Renardo Sidney–Dave Leitao relationship, originally documented here and here…  Tuesday’s LA Times recap of The Sidney family’s visit to Charlottesville last [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stats Are For Losers (and 6-3 Underachievers) by Stats are for Losers Redux &#171; bryanerogers&#8217;s weblog</title>
		<link>http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com/2008/11/04/stats-are-for-losers-and-6-3-underachievers/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Stats are for Losers Redux &#171; bryanerogers&#8217;s weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com/?p=209#comment-110</guid>
		<description>[...] are for Losers&#160;Redux  Two weeks ago, you learned in this space that the Washington Redskins ranked 31st out of 32 teams in points per 100 yards of total.  Since [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are for Losers&nbsp;Redux  Two weeks ago, you learned in this space that the Washington Redskins ranked 31st out of 32 teams in points per 100 yards of total.  Since [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Get-able Get? by Renardo Sidney Cont&#8217;d &#171; bryanerogers&#8217;s weblog</title>
		<link>http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com/2008/11/13/a-get-able-get/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Renardo Sidney Cont&#8217;d &#171; bryanerogers&#8217;s weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 05:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanerogers.wordpress.com/?p=229#comment-106</guid>
		<description>[...] bryanerogers&#8217;s weblog Just another WordPress.com weblog      &#171; A Get-able&#160;Get? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bryanerogers&#8217;s weblog Just another WordPress.com weblog      &laquo; A Get-able&nbsp;Get? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
